Fifty Shades of...
So, Fifty Shades of It’s Not Porn Darling, I Swear hit the market
recently. And, I have to admit, a lot of
the pictures and statuses and shares and shit around it have me a little hot
under the collar, but not for the conventional reason associated with this
movie. Let me illustrate why I’m
irritated with a little story:
In 1999, I was still a hopeful,
doe-eyed medical student who hadn’t yet realized that his true calling wasn’t
elbow-deep in human guts. During this
period I was also a resident at Knockando Men’s Residence, a place which
encouraged an active social life, to say the least. (In retrospect, this may be the reason why I
am a former medical student instead of a current doctor…) At some point during this year, French
director Catherine Breillat released a movie entitled Romance X. (Please note, I
am going by what IMDB says here. I can’t
remember the actual chronology, and I am also a person who willingly gives
himself over to selective recall if it is more entertaining than the actual
story) Breillat is a provocative
director who is well known for her frank treatment of sometimes awkward sexual
themes, and RoX, as it shall now be
abbreviated, is no different: The film’s
female protagonist is actively searching for some kind of self-actualization
and redemption after an asexual relationship with a neglectful partner leaves
her mired in self-doubt.
Now, don’t be fooled by that
awesomely insightful synopsis: I did not
go see RoX because of my fervent
desire to see one woman be redeemed at all costs. I was 20 years old, for God’s sake, and the
only redemption I was concerned with was redemption from my own virginity. No, myself and a handful of res buddies ponied up the ticket money solely because we
were precocious young men, and because a porn actor of legendary reputation
(And girth) by the name of Rocco Siffredi was the main love interest – Or
rather, “love” interest. This also meant
that there were likely scenes too racy for any normal actor, which was fine by
us. I guess you could say we got our RoX on to get our rocks off. (Thank you and good night!!) I remember sitting in the cinema, looking
across the row of young meatheads in a room quasi-full of art house flick
enthusiasts and thinking: “We are
honestly here because of our admiration for another man’s penis. I can’t decide if we’re super-open-minded, if
we’re repressed homosexuals or if we just have too much time on our
hands…”
RoX turned out to be far more explicit than any of us had bargained
for, but treated most of the subject matter in such a casual European way that
it was kind of like watching Sleepless In
Seattle, but with less uncomfortable lingering on Tom Hanks’ face. One such scene had Rocco’s character asking
if the protagonist would like to indulge in a sex act that most women only
agree to once an engagement ring has made an appearance. Her response to this unorthodox request was
not a shocked and disgusted “No! I have
pepper spray in my purse!!”, but a casual, musically-intoned “Not yet”. This lilting “Not yet” became the punchline
for a million in-jokes at res over the subsequent two years… I suppose one could say we left the movie
theatre as more culturally well-rounded gentlemen, but if one said that one
would be lying through one’s teeth.
The point I’m driving at
here: None of us were under any illusion
that the movie we went to watch that day was not, in essence, pornography. You didn’t catch us running around our
respective campuses bragging about having seen it, because we would have been
shunned so hard that our sclerae would have haemorrhaged (See, Mom and Dad,
that medical school money wasn’t a total waste!!) So, we killed a spare afternoon, learned a
little, adopted a new catchphrase and moved on.
Now, flash-forward sixteen
years:
Fifty Shades of I’m A Sexually Repressed Housewife is doing the
rounds, and I see women of similar age and station as myself lining up around
the block to see it. Dressed up, taking
selfies in the cinema, smiling and bragging that they’re about to watch a Goddamn porno.
Although, before I go further, I need to interrupt myself here to make a
few solvent points:
-
Despite the source material, the film adaptation
of Fifty Shades of The Author Cashing In
is actually quite timid, or so I hear. But
we’re talking principle here, people.
-
Yes, I realize that the world has come a long
way since the 90’s, when women dressed like men and men dressed like toddlers,
but still.
-
No, I don’t think female sexual expression is
bad. Quite the opposite, in fact.
-
Social media complicates everything more than
slightly here. I have no doubt that if
Facegram or Instabook had existed in 1999 myself and my friends would have been
taking stupid photos and posting stupid statuses and being stupid about how
stupid we were being, but let’s be clear, friends and neighbours: “Stupid” is the default setting for
20-year-old males the world over. Not an
excuse, mind you, but just context.
I guess the reason I’m fuming
is the double standard. If I had posted
a bunch of selfies with friends just before watching 2 hours of torture porn,
it would have taken 3.3 seconds before my timeline would have collapsed under
the weight of people calling me a pig. Yet,
because of societal attitudes being what they are, it’s cool for book clubs and
spinning class friends to go watch Fifty
Shades of Anastasia’s Tireless Devotion To Depersonalizing Herself To Please A
Callous And Deeply Flawed Man. Men
watching a woman liberate herself is bad because of things like the “Not yet”
scene, but women watching a woman be sexually subjugated is fine.
Although, now that I think
about it, I guess societal attitudes towards gender roles is actually the
problem.
Sorry, ladies, forget I said
anything…

Comments
Post a Comment